[Federal Register: September 16, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 179)]
[Notices]
[Page 58357-58358]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16se02-34]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
Proposed Collection of Information; Comment Request--Procurement
of Goods and Services
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission requests comments on a
proposed extension of approval for a period of three years from the
date of approval of a collection of information associated with the
procurement of goods and services. Forms used by the Commission for
procurement of goods and services request persons who quote, propose,
or bid on contracts to provide information needed to evaluate quotes,
proposals, and bids in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
The Commission will consider all comments received in response to
this notice before requesting extension of approval of this collection
of information from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: The Office of the Secretary must receive comments not later than
November 15, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be captioned ``Procurement of Goods
and Services; Paperwork Reduction Act,'' and mailed to the Office of
the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, D.C.
20207, or delivered to that office, room 502, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814. Written comments may also be sent to the
Office of the Secretary by facsimile at (301) 504-0127 or by e-mail at
cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the proposed
collection of information call or write Linda L. Glatz, Management and
Program Analyst, Office of Planning and Evaluation, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Washington, D.C. 20207; (301) 504-0416, Ext. 2226.
[[Page 58358]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission's procurement of goods and
services is governed by the Federal Property and Administrative
Services Act of 1949, as amended (41 U.S.C. 253 et seq.). That law
requires the Commission to procure goods and services under conditions
most advantageous to the government, considering cost and other
factors.
A. Information Required by Procurement Forms
The Commission requires persons and firms to submit quotations,
proposals, and bids for contracts to provide goods and services on
standardized forms. These forms request information from offerors about
costs or prices of goods and services to be supplied; specifications of
goods and descriptions of services to be delivered; competence of the
offeror to provide the goods or services; and other information about
the offeror such as the size of the firm and whether it is minority
owned. The Commission uses the information provided by offerors to
determine the reasonableness of prices and costs and the responsiveness
of potential contractors to undertake the work involved so that all
bids may be awarded in accordance with Federal procurement laws.
OMB approved the collection of information requirements in the
procurement forms used by the Commission under control number 3041-
0059. OMB's most recent extension of approval will expire on November
30, 2002. The CPSC now proposes to request extension of approval for
the information collection requirements in the forms used for
procurement of goods and services. The Commission plans to use the
Internet and the General Services Administration's (GSA) GSA Advantage!
System for delivery order purchasing. The Internet provides small
businesses access to information about the Commission's current needs
for goods and services.
B. Information Collection Burden
During fiscal year 2001, approximately 2,539 firms spent about
14,174 hours responding to all Requests for Quotations (RFQs), and
Requests for Proposals (RFPs) issued by the Commission. The time
required by vendors to respond ranged from as little as 10 to 15
minutes per firm for a simple telephone, e-mail, fax, or Internet
response concerning the purchase of a standard item or service, to as
much as 100-200 hours per firm for a complex written offer prepared in
response to technically complex RFQs and RFPs. Based on the number of
procurements, details of actions reported by the Federal Procurement
Data System, and the procurement staff's experience with the sales and
technical functions of various vendors, we believe firms spent an
estimated 11,624 hours responding to oral, electronic, and written RFQs
and RFPs and approximately 2,550 hours preparing quotes and proposals
in response to more complex RFQs and RFPs. The cost of preparing a
response to an oral, electronic, or written RFQ or RFP is estimated to
be approximately $36 per hour for regular sales staff and $55 per hour
for high level sales staff with advanced technical expertise for more
complex procurements (based on Web search at the Career Journal from
the Wall Street Journal and Salary.com and research of salary tables
from ``Sales and Marketing Management'' magazine dated May 2001). The
annualized cost to all firms for responding to all RFQs and RFPs issued
by the Commission is estimated to be $558,714 (11,624 hours x $36/hr +
2,550 hours x $55/hr = $558,714).
The total cost to the government for all collections of information
by the Commission related to procurement of goods and services is
estimated to be about $972,187 a year. This estimate was made by
reviewing the Commission's procurement activities in fiscal year 2001.
C. Request for Comments
The Commission solicits written comments from all interested
persons about the proposed collection of information. The Commission
specifically solicits information relevant to the following topics:
--Whether the collection of information described above is necessary
for the proper performance of the Commission's functions, including
whether the information would have practical utility;
--Whether the estimated burden of the proposed collection of
information is accurate;
--Whether the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
--Whether the burden imposed by the collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated, electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of information technology.
Dated: September 10, 2002.
Todd Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-23454 Filed 9-13-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P