Candle Wicks Containing Lead and Candles with Such Wicks; Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Comments and Information
[Federal Register: February 20, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 34)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 10863-10865]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20fe01-27]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1500
Candle Wicks Containing Lead and Candles with Such Wicks; Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Comments and Information
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In March of 2000, the Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) collectively docketed under Petition No. HP 00-3 petitions
submitted by several petitioners requesting that the Commission ban
candle wicks containing lead and candles with such wicks. A candle wick
containing lead is one with a metallic core that contains lead. Based
on information in those petitions and subsequent investigations by CPSC
staff, the Commission has reason to believe that certain candles with
wicks containing lead may emit toxic levels of lead as a result of
normal use, and thus may contribute to substantial illness.
This advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) initiates a
rulemaking proceeding that could result in a rule banning certain
candle wicks containing lead and candles with such wicks.\1\ This
proceeding is commenced under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Chairman Brown and Commissioner Moore voted to grant the
petition and send the ANPR directly to the Office of the Federal
Register for publication. Commissioner Gall voted to grant the
petition and to submit the ANPR to the Office of Management and
Budget prior to sending it to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication. Separate statements of Chairman Brown, Commissioner
Moore and Commissioner Gall concerning their votes are available
from the CPSC Office of the Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission solicits written comments concerning the risks of
illness associated with burning candles with wicks containing lead, the
regulatory alternatives discussed in this notice, other possible ways
to address these risks, and the economic impacts of the various
regulatory alternatives. The Commission also invites interested persons
to submit an existing standard, or a statement of intent to modify or
develop a voluntary standard, to address the risk of illness described
in this notice.
DATE: Written comments and submissions in response to this notice must
be received by April 23, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be mailed, preferably in five copies, to the
Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Washington, DC 20207-0001, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814; telephone (301) 504-0800. Comments also may
be filed by telefacsimile to (301) 504-0127 or by e-mail to cpsc-
os@cpsc.gov. Comments should be captioned ``ANPR for Candle Wicks
Containing Lead.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kristina Hatlelid, Ph.D., M.P.H.,
Directorate for Health Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Washington, DC 20207; telephone (301) 504-0494, ext. 1389.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background/Product
On March 17, 2000, the CPSC collectively docketed as a petition
under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA) petitions received
from Public Citizen and jointly from the National Apartment Association
and the National Multi Housing Council, all of which requested that the
Commission ban lead-containing candles and wicks sold for candle-making
that contain lead (Petition No. HP 00-3). 65 FR 19742 (April 12, 2000).
A candlewick containing lead is a wick with a metallic core that
contains lead. The metallic core may be primarily lead or may be
primarily zinc or tin with a lesser lead content. Such metallic cores
are used to provide structural rigidity to the wick to keep it straight
during candle production and to provide an upright wick during burning.
Information obtained from the petitions and subsequent Commission
staff investigations indicates that burning candles containing
metallic-cored wicks with a lead content exceeding 0.06% by weight may
result in potentially toxic levels of air emissions of lead.
B. The Risk of Illness
The scientific community recognizes a level of 10 micrograms of
lead per deciliter of blood (10 g/dL) as a
[[Page 10864]]
threshold level of concern with respect to lead poisoning in children.
The most current national survey shows that nearly 1 million children
have elevated blood lead levels (greater than (10 g/dL). This
figure represents approximately 4.4% of children under 6 years of age.
The adverse health effects of lead poisoning in children are well-
documented and may have long-lasting or permanent consequences. These
effects include neurological damage, delayed mental and physical
development, attention and learning deficiencies, and hearing problems.
Because lead accumulates in the body, even exposure to small amounts
can contribute to the subsequent risk of adverse health effects.
Investigations by the CPSC laboratory staff and other laboratories
indicate that lead-cored candles can emit up to 2,200 g of
lead per hour during candle burning. These investigations also indicate
that the rate at which lead might be emitted from burning a particular
candle cannot reliably be predicted based on the lead content of the
wick in question. CPSC staff believes that, under some use conditions,
these lead emissions present a risk to consumers through inhalation of
airborne lead and through contact with lead deposited onto surfaces in
the room.
C. Relevant Statutory Provisions
This proceeding is conducted pursuant to the Federal Hazardous
Substances Act (FHSA), 15 U.S.C. 1261 et seq. Section 2(f)(1)(A) of the
FHSA defines ``hazardous substance'' to include any substance or
mixture of substances which is toxic and may cause substantial illness
as a proximate result of any customary or reasonably foreseeable
handling or use. 15 U.S.C. 1261(f)(1)(A).
Under section 2(q)(1)(B) of the FHSA, if the Commission determines
that, ``notwithstanding such cautionary labeling as is or may be
required under this Act for that substance, the degree or nature of the
hazard involved in the presence or use of such [hazardous] substance in
households is such that the objective of the protection of the public
health and safety can be adequately served only by keeping such
substance, when so intended or packaged, out of the channels of
interstate commerce,'' then such substance is a ``banned hazardous
substance.'' 15 U.S.C. 1261(q)(1)(B).
Section 3(b) of the FHSA provides authority for the Commission to
establish additional labeling requirements for hazardous substances
beyond those prescribed by section 2(p)(1) of the Act if necessary for
protection of the public health and safety. 15 U.S.C. 1262(b). Once
such additional requirements are established by regulation, a product
intended, or packaged in a form suitable, for use in the household or
by children that is not so labeled is a ``misbranded'' hazardous
substance. Id.
Section 3(a) of the FHSA governs a Commission proceeding to declare
a substance a ``hazardous substance.'' 15 U.S.C 1262(a). Sections 3(f)
through 3(i), 15 U.S.C. 1262(f)-(i), govern a proceeding to promulgate
a regulation declaring a hazardous substance to be a banned hazardous
substance.
As provided in sections 3(a)(2) and 3(f), this proceeding is
commenced by issuance of this ANPR. After considering any comments
submitted in response to this ANPR, the Commission will decide whether
to issue a proposed rule and a preliminary regulatory analysis in
accordance with section 3(h) of the FHSA. If a proposed rule is issued,
the Commission would then consider the comments received in response to
the proposed rule in deciding whether to issue a final rule and a final
regulatory analysis. 15 U.S.C. 1262(i).
D. Regulatory Alternatives
One or more of the following alternatives could be used to reduce
the identified risks associated with candle wicks containing lead and
candles with such wicks.
1. Mandatory rule. The Commission could issue a rule declaring
certain candle wicks containing lead and candles with such wicks to be
banned hazardous substances. This rule could define the banned products
in terms of physical or performance characteristics, or both.
2. Labeling rule. The Commission could issue a special labeling
rule for candle wicks containing lead and candles with such wicks
requiring that they contain specified warnings and instructions.
3. Voluntary standard. If the industry developed, adopted, and
substantially conformed to an adequate voluntary standard, the
Commission could defer to the voluntary standard in lieu of issuing a
mandatory rule.
E. Existing Standards
In 1974, the Candle Manufacturers Association trade group made a
voluntary commitment to eliminate lead from candle wicks. However,
analyses by CPSC and by Public Citizen of the lead content of recently-
purchased metallic wick candles show that wicks in some candles
currently on the market continue to contain substantial amounts of
lead.
In September 1999 the Australian Minister for Financial Services
and Regulation banned the sale of candles with lead wicks in that
country. In June 2000 the New Zealand Minister of Consumer Affairs
banned the importation or sale of lead wick candles in that country.
According to Commission staff, neither of these bans are based on a
standard for maximum allowable lead level. The Commission is not aware
of any other promulgated state, voluntary, foreign, international, or
other standard dealing with the described risk of illness.
F. Economic Considerations
1. Candle sales
Retail sales of candles in the U.S. for 1999 are estimated to be
$2.3 billion, and are expected to rise to $3.2 billion in 2001. U.S.
imports of candles in 1999 amounted to about $484 million, about half
from the Far East, about one third from the Americas (mostly Canada and
Mexico), and less than 10 percent from Europe and Great Britain.
2. Suppliers
Based on information gathered by CPSC staff, there are at least 200
and possibly over 350 commercial, institutional, and religious
manufacturers of candles in the U.S. Most of these manufacturers are
apparently small businesses.
There are only a few manufacturers of candle wicks in the U.S. The
leading domestic firm indicates to CPSC staff that it supplies the
majority of candle wicks to the U.S. candle industry.
3. Substitutes
CPSC staff believes that substitutes for lead wicks are readily
available. Staff also believes that substituting non-lead materials for
lead in wicks will not increase costs to candle manufacturers or
consumers. Comments on both of these issues are specifically solicited.
G. Solicitation of Information and Comments
This ANPR is an initial step in a proceeding that could result in a
mandatory rule for candle wicks containing lead and candles with such
wicks to address the described risk of illness. All interested persons
are invited to submit to the Commission their comments on any aspect of
the alternatives discussed above. In particular, CPSC solicits the
following additional information:
1. The types and numbers of candle wicks containing lead and
candles with
[[Page 10865]]
such wicks produced for sale in the U.S. each year from 1990 to the
present;
2. The names and addresses of manufacturers and distributors of
candle wicks containing lead and candles with such wicks;
3. Comparisons of the utility obtained from candle wicks containing
lead and candles with such wicks versus any available substitute
products;
4. An explanation of substitutes for candle wicks containing lead
and candles with such wicks that could reduce the described risk of
illness;
5. Physical or performance characteristics of the wick and candle
products that could or should not be used to define which products
might be subject to a rule;
6. The costs to wick and candle manufacturers involved in either
substituting materials for lead in metallic-cored wicks to remove the
risk or removing candles with such wicks from the market;
7. The costs to wick manufacturers/importers/distributors of
testing or other efforts to ensure that wicks are in compliance.
8. Other information on the potential costs and benefits of
potential rules;
9. Information on any potentially significant environmental impacts
of any of the regulatory alternatives identified in this ANPR,
including a ban on candles and candle wicks containing more that 0.06%
lead by weight;
10. Steps that have been taken by industry or others to reduce the
risk of illness from the products;
11. The likelihood and nature of any significant economic impact of
a rule on small entities;
12. The costs and benefits of mandating a banning, labeling, or
instructions requirement.
Also, in accordance with section 3(f) of the FHSA, the Commission
solicits:
1. Written comments with respect to the risk of illness identified
by the Commission, the regulatory alternatives being considered, and
other possible alternatives for addressing the risk.
2. Any existing standard or portion of a standard which could be
issued as a proposed regulation.
3. A statement of intention to modify or develop a voluntary
standard to address the risk of illness discussed in this notice, along
with a description of a plan (including a schedule) to do so.
Comments should be mailed, preferably in five copies, to the Office
of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC
20207-0001, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda,
Maryland 20814; telephone (301) 504-0800. Comments also may be filed by
telefacsimile to (301) 504-0127 or by e-mail to cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.
Comments should be captioned ``ANPR for Candle Wicks Containing Lead.''
All comments and submissions should be received no later than April 23,
2001.
Dated: February 13, 2001.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-4030 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P