HMB Corporation (f/k/a Taylor Electric Supply, Inc.), Respondent
Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order
[Federal Register: September 5, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 172)]
[Notices]
[Page 46434-46437]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05se01-51]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 01-C0011]
HMB Corporation (f/k/a Taylor Electric Supply, Inc.), Respondent
Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR
1115.20(b)(4). Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement
Agreement with HMB Corporation (f/k/a Taylor Electric Supply, Inc.)
requiring that HMB Corporation pay between $87,500 through $175,000 for
the remediation of certain in-wall electric heaters it distributed that
were manufactured by Cadet Manufacturing Company.
DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written
request with the Office of the Secretary by September 20, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the Comment 01-C0011, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard N. Tarnoff, Trial Attorney,
Office of Compliance, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington,
DC 20207; telephone (301) 504-0626, 1382.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: August 29, 2001.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Acting Secretary.
Consent Agreement
This Consent Agreement is made by and between the staff of the
Consumer Product Safety Commission, and HMB Corporation (f/k/a Taylor
Electric Supply, Inc.) ``HMB''), a domestic corporation, to settle the
staff's allegations that HMB, doing business as Taylor Electric Supply,
distributed in commerce certain allegedly defective in-wall electric
heaters manufactured by Cadet Manufacturing Company (``Cadet''), a
domestic corporation, with its principal place of business located at
2500 West Fourth Plain Boulevard, Vancouver, Washington 98660.
Parties
1. The ``staff'' is the staff of the Consumer Product Safety
Commission (``the CPSC'' or ``the Commission''), an independent
regulatory agency of the United States of America, established by
Congress pursuant to section 4 of the Consumer Product Safety Act
(``CPSA''), 15 U.S.C. 2053, as amended.
2. Respondent HMB is a corporation organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Oregon. HMB owns and maintains two commercial
buildings and the property on which they are located at 1709 S.E. 3rd
Ave., and 240 S.E. Clay Blvd., Portland, Oregon. HMB leases the
property to Rexel Taylor Corporation, which, through its subsidiary
Summers Group, Inc., purchased HMB's wholesale electrical distribution
business in 1997.
Subject Matter
3. Since approximately 1978, Cadet allegedly manufactured, sold
and/or distributed in commerce in-wall electric heaters for use in
homes and residences under the brand names ``Cadet'' and ``Encore.''
These include all models and variants within each model of the series
[[Page 46435]]
FW (including models FW-051, FW-101, FW-122, FW-202, and FW-751),
manufactured between 1978 and 1987; series FX (including models FX-051,
FX-052, FX-071, FX-072, FX-101, FX-102, FX-122, FX-151, FX-152, FX-202,
and FX-242), manufactured between 1985 and 1994; series LX (including
models LX-242, LX-302, LX-402, and LX-482), manufactured between 1985
and 1994; series TK (including models TK-051, TK-071, TK-072, TK-101,
TK-102, TK-151, and TK-152), manufactured between 1984 and 1998; series
ZA (including models ZA-051, ZA-052, ZA-071, ZA-072, ZA-101, ZA-102,
ZA-122, ZA-151, ZA-152, ZA-202, and ZA-242), manufactured between 1985
and 1994; series Z (including models Z-072, Z-101, Z-102, Z-151, Z-152,
Z-202, and Z-208), manufactured between 1993 and 1999; and all series
and models of the same or functionally identical heaters manufactured
and distributed by Cadet under the Encore brand name, including series
RX (including modes RX-072, RX-101, RX-102, RX-151, RX-152, RX-202, and
RX-242), manufactured between 1985 and 1994; series RLX (including
models RLX-302, RLX-402, and RLX-482) manufactured between 1985 and
1994; series RK (including models RK-101 and RK-102), manufactured
between 1984 and 1998; series RA (including models RA-101, RA-102, RA-
151, RA-152, and RA-202), manufactured between 1985 and 1994; series ZC
(including models ZC-072, ZC-101 ZC-102, ZC-151, ZC-152, ZC-202, and
ZC-208), manufactured between 1993 and 1999; and series RW,
manufactured between 1978 and 1981. For each of these heaters, the
variants signified by the suffix T (with thermostat), W (white color),
and TW (with thermostat and white color) found after the model number
are included. All the heaters and variants referred to in this
paragraph shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as ``the
Heaters.'' The Heaters were sold and/or distributed to consumers
principally in the States of California, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and
Washington. Between approximately 1982 and 1997, Taylor Electric Supply
allegedly sold and/or distributed certain of the Heaters in commerce.
4. On January 14, 1999, the staff filed an Administrative Complaint
(``Complaint'') against Cadet, seeking a determination that certain of
the Heaters present a substantial product hazard within the meaning of
section 15(a)(2) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(a)(2), and public notice
and a recall of certain of the Heaters pursuant to sections 15(c) and
(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(c) and (d). The Complaint alleged that
certain of the Heaters are defective and present a substantial product
hazard within the meaning of section 15(a)(2) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(a)(2), because their design and/or manufacture causes them to
overheat, fail, and catch fire; and/or allows lint, dirt, or debris to
build up within the heaters and catch fire. The Complaint also alleged
that the design of certain of the Heaters can cause the Heaters to spew
flames and/or burning or molten particles, or eject sparks into the
living space of a home or residence, or energize the Heaters creating a
risk of electric shock. On July 30, 1999, the CPSC approved a Consent
Agreement and Order (``the Cadet Order'') between the Staff and Cadet
which, inter alia, required Cadet to undertake a remediation program
for notification to consumers and for the replacement of the Heaters
(``the Cadet Corrective Action Plan'' or ``the Plan''). The Plan became
effective on February 17, 2000. As of April 30, 2001, consumers had
ordered 332,857 replacement heaters under the Cadet Corrective Action
Plan.
Agreement of the Parties
5. It is the express purpose of the parties entering this Consent
Agreement to protect the public safety by assisting Cadet's recall and
replacement of the Heaters.
6. Fulfillment of the terms of this Consent Agreement and the
attached Order (hereinafter ``Order'' or ``the Order''), which is
hereby incorporated by reference, shall resolve all potential
obligations of HMB (and each of HMB's successors, assigns, parents,
subsidiaries, affiliated entities, agents, representatives, attorneys,
employees, officers, directors, stockholders, and principals)
(collectively ``the HMB Releasees'') under Sections 15(c) and (d) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(c) and (d), to give public notice of the
alleged hazard presented by the Heaters, and to repair, replace, or
refund the purchase price of the Heaters. Fulfillment of the terms of
this Consent Agreement and Order shall also resolve all potential
obligations and liabilities of the HMB Releasees for all other claims
and causes of action which could have been alleged by the CPSC against
the HMB Releasees relating to the Heaters, based upon information known
to the CPSC, or otherwise in the CPSC's possession, at the time the
CPSC staff signs this Consent Agreement. Nothing in this Paragraph 6 is
intended to limit the CPSC's rights under Paragraph 20 of this Consent
Agreement.
7. The staff believes that this Consent Agreement and Order is an
equitable resolution of consumer claims against HMB for replacement
heaters, and the staff has concluded that the Cadet Corrective Action
Plan, and HMB's participation in that Plan, will provide an effective,
fair, reasonable and adequate remedy for consumers throughout the
United States who own or are otherwise exposed to the Heaters by
notifying consumers of the alleged hazard and providing replacement
heaters to them, and that this Agreement is, therefore, in the best
interests of consumers.
8. This Consent Agreement and Order shall not be deemed or
construed as an admission by HMB or as evidence: (a) Of any violation
of law or regulation by HMB; (b) of other wrongdoing by HMB; (c) that
the Heaters are defective, create a substantial product hazard, or are
unreasonably dangerous; or (d) of the truth of any claims or other
matters alleged or otherwise stated by the CPSC or any other person
either against HMB or with respect to the Heaters.
9. The Heaters are ``consumer products'' within the meaning of
Section 3(a)(1) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(1).
10. HMB (f/k/a Taylor Electric Supply) was a ``distributor'' of
``consumer product[s],'' which were ``distributed in commerce,'' as
those terms are defined in sections 3(a)(1), (5), and (11) of the CPSA,
15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(1), (5), and (11).
11. The CPSC has jurisdiction over HMB and the Heaters under
sections 3(a)(1), (5), and (11) and section 15 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2052(a)(1), (5), and (11) and Sec. 2064.
12. For purposes of this settlement only, HMB agrees not to contest
the staff's allegation, which HMB denies, that the Heaters contain a
``defect which creates a substantial product hazard,'' as those terms
are defined in section 15(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(a).
13. Upon final acceptance by the CPSC of this Consent Agreement and
Order, HMB knowingly, voluntarily, and completely waives and
relinquishes any past, present, and/or future right or rights in this
matter: (a) To the issuance of a proposed complaint in accordance with
16 CFR 1115.20(6), to an administrative or judicial hearing, and to all
further procedural steps--including findings of fact and conclusions of
law--to determine whether the Heaters contain a defect which creates a
substantial product hazard within the meaning of section 15 of the
CPSA; (b) to seek judicial review or otherwise challenge or contest the
validity of this consent Agreement and
[[Page 46436]]
Order as issued and entered; (c) to seek judicial review of this or any
past orders, findings, and/or determinations of the CPSC in this
matter, except as set forth in Paragraphs 21 and 24 of this Consent
Agreement; and (d) to file any claim or to seek any remedy under the
Equal Access to Justice Act.
14. The order is issued under Sections 15(c) and (d) of the CPSA,
15 U.S.C. 2064(c) and 9d), and a violation of this Consent Agreement
and Order is a prohibited act within the meaning of section 19(a)(5) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(5), and may subject HMB to civil and/or
criminal penalties under sections 20 and 21 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069
and 2070.
15. HMB agrees to fulfill all requirements of this Consent
Agreement and Order.
16. For all purposes, this Consent Agreement and Order shall
constitute an enforceable judgment obtained in ana ction or proceeding
by a governmental unit to enforce its police and regulatory power. HMB
acknowledges and agrees that this Consent Agreement and order are
pursuant to the CPSC's police and regulatory power to remedy the
alleged risk created by the Heaters, and that, once HMB signs the
Consent Agreement and Order, the Consent Agreement and Order will not
be subject to an automatic stay in any bankruptcy proceeding involving
HMB.
17. HMB acknowledges that any interested person may bring an action
pursuant to section 24 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2073, in any United
States District Court in which HMB is found or transacts business, to
enforce the Order and to obtain appropriate injunctive relief.
18. This Consent Agreement and Order shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors,
assigns, and any operating bankruptcy trustees or receivers. If, prior
to the termination of this Consent Agreement and Order, HMB merges with
any other business entity or sells, assigns, or otherwise transfers
substantially all of its assets. HMB shall provide reasonable prior
notice to the surviving corporation or to the purchaser, assignee, or
transferee of substantially all of HMB's assets, of this Consent
Agreement and Order, and of its binding effect upon said surviving
corporation, purchaser, assignee, or transferee. The existence of this
Consent Agreement and Order and its binding effect shall be noted in
any agreement between HMB and such surviving corporation, purchaser,
assignee, or transferee shall execute a document agreeing to be bound
by the provisions of this Consent Agreement and Order and shall submit
to the jurisdiction of the CPSC for purposes of enforcement of this
Consent Agreement and Order. In the event of any merger, sale,
assignment, or transfer of substantially all of HMB's assets, HMB shall
provide written notice to the staff at least sixty (60) days prior to
any such merger, asset sale, assignment, or transfer.
19. The CPSC, the staff, and/or HMB may disclose terms of this
Consent Agreement and Order to the public.
20. If any provision of this Consent Agreement and Order is held to
be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws
effective during the term of this Consent Agreement and Order, such
provision shall be fully severable. In such event, there shall be added
as part of this Consent Agreement and Order a provision as similar in
terms to such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable provision as may be
possible and be legal, valid, and enforceable. The effective date of
the added provision shall be the date upon which the prior provision
was held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable. The rest of the
Consent Agreement and Order shall remain in full effect, unless the
CPSC determines, after providing HMB with notice and a reasonable
opportunity to comment, that severing the provision materially impacts
the Cadet Corrective Action Plan. The CPSC determination shall
constitute the final agency decision and shall be subject to judicial
review, such review to be based upon the record of any such CPSC
proceeding and according to law.
21. This Consent Agreement and Order have been negotiated by the
parties. HMB is not relying on the advice of the staff, nor anyone
associated with the staff, as to legal, tax, or other consequences of
any kind arising out of this Consent Agreement and Order, and HMB
specifically assumes the risk of all legal, tax, and other
consequences.
22. HMB acknowledges that this Consent Agreement and Order have
been negotiated between unrelated, sophisticated, and knowledgeable
parties acting in their own self-interest and represented by counsel,
and the provisions of this Consent Agreement and Order shall not be
interpreted or construed against any person or entity because that
person or entity or any of its attorneys or representatives drafted or
participated in drafting this Consent Agreement and Order.
23. The provisions of this Consent Agreement and Order shall be
interpreted in a reasonable manner to effect its purpose to remedy the
alleged hazard that the Heaters pose and to resolve potential claims by
the CPSC against HMB with respect to the Heaters.
24. The existence of a dispute between the staff and HMB over any
provision of this Consent Agreement and Order shall not excuse, toll,
or suspend any obligation or deadline imposed upon HMB under this
Consent Agreement and Order, other than the specific provision in
dispute.
25. This Consent Agreement and Order shall not be waived, changed,
amended, modified, or otherwise altered, except in writing executed by
the parties and approved by the CPSC.
26. This Consent Agreement and Order contain the entire agreement,
understanding, representation, and interpretation of the parties
herein, and nothing else may be used to vary or contradict its terms.
27. HMB's obligations under this Consent Agreement and Order shall
terminate when HMB makes the final payment required under Paragraphs 3
and 4 of the Order.
28. HMB makes the monetary payments described in Paragraphs 3 and 4
of the Order solely as restitution to find the Cadet Corrective Action
Plan and thereby to settle claims arising out of its alleged
distribution of the Heaters. No payment made pursuant to, or referred
to in this Consent Agreement and Order is a fine or other penalty paid
with respect to any violation of any law or regulation. Payment
hereunder does not constitute, nor shall it be construed or treated as,
payment in lieu of a fine or other penalty, punitive recovery, or
forfeiture.
29. HMB may request appropriate verification from the staff,
including record review, of the number of replacement heaters ordered
from Cadet under the Cadet Corrective Action Plan. Upon receipt of a
request from HMB, the staff shall provide such verification, subject to
appropriate protective orders preserving the confidentiality of
business records obtained from Cadet. In the event that such
verification demonstrates the number of replacement heaters represented
by the CPSC to HMB pursuant to Paragraph 5 of the Order to be
incorrect, thus rendering HMB's payment into the escrow account
incorrect, the staff shall direct the Escrow Agent to refund the
overpayment to HMB in the amount of $0.875 per heater. A dispute as to
the proper amount of contingent contribution shall be resolved in
accordance with Paragraph 24 of this Consent Agreement.
30. HMB and the staff consent to the entry of the Order attached
hereto.
31. Upon provisional acceptance of this Consent Agreement and Order
by
[[Page 46437]]
the CPSC, this Consent Agreement and Order shall be placed on the
public record and shall be published in the Federal Register in
accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR 1115.20(b)(4). If
the CPSC does not receive any written request not to accept this
Consent Agreement and Order within fifteen (15) calendar days, this
Consent Agreement and Order shall be deemed finally accepted on the
twentieth (20th) calendar day after the date it is published in the
Federal Register in accordance with 16 CFR 1115.20(b)(5).
32. Upon final acceptance by the CPSC of this Consent Agreement and
Order, the CPSC shall issue the incorporated Order. This Consent
Agreement and Order shall become effective upon service of the signed
Order upon HMB.
33. The parties have executed two (2) identical copies of this
Consent Agreement and the two copies shall be treated as one and the
same executed Consent Agreement.
Dated: July 12, 2001.
Howard N. Tarnoff,
Trial Attorney.
Margaret H. Plank,
Trial Attorney.
Eric L. Stone,
Director, Legal Division.
Alan H. Schoem,
Assistant Executive Director, Office of Compliance, U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814. Telephone: (301) 504-0626, Facsimile: (301) 504-0359.
Dated: July 23, 2001.
William H. Taylor,
President, HMB Corporation, P.O. Box 15198, Portland, OR 97293.
Telephone: (503) 233-5321.
Order
Upon consideration of the Consent Agreement entered into between
Respondent HMB Corporation (``HMB'') and the staff of the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (``the staff'') (collectively ``the
parties'') and
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (``the CPSC'' or ``the
Commission'') having jurisdiction over the subject matter and HMB;
It is hereby ordered that:
1. The Consent Agreement between HMB and the staff is
incorporated herein by reference and accepted, and HMB shall comply
with all obligations of the Consent Agreement and this Order.
2. Based on the Consent Agreement, the CPSC finds that the
Consent Agreement and this Order are necessary to protect the public
from the alleged hazard presented by Cadet's series FW, FX, LX, TK,
ZA, and Z in-wall electric heaters, and the functionally identical
heaters manufactured and distributed by Cadet under the Encore brand
name, including series RX, RLX, RK, RA, RW, and ZC. These heaters
shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as ``the Heaters.''
3. HMB shall pay into an escrow account (Chase Manhattan Trust
Company, National Association, Account #76609060682) established by
the staff and Cadet for the purpose of remedying the alleged hazard
posed by the heaters (``Escrow Account'') the sum of EIGHTY--SEVEN
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($87.500) upon the CPSC's final
acceptance of this Order.
4. HMB shall pay into the Escrow Account contingent
contribution(s) of an additional ($0.875) for every heater in excess
of three hundred and fifty thousand (350,000) heaters ordered by
consumers on or before February 17, 2002, under the Cadet Consent
Agreement and Order, which was approved by the CPSC on July 30, 1999
(``the Cadet Order''). HMB's contingent contribution(s) shall be
capped at EIGHTY--SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($87,500). HMB
shall pay contingent contributions quarterly within fifteen (15)
days of HMB's receipt of written notice from the staff of the number
of replacement heaters over 350,000 ordered by consumers on or
before February 17, 2002, and shipped by Cadet under the terms of
the Cadet Order.
5. The CPSC may authorize the distribution of the monetary
payments referred to in Paragraphs 3 and 4 above: (a) To offset
expenses directly related to Cadet's CPSC-approved Corrective Action
Plan; and/or (b) to otherwise remedy the alleged hazard posed by the
Heaters.
6. In addition to any penalty it may incur pursuant to Paragraph
14 of the Consent Agreement, if HMB fails to make timely
contributions to the Escrow Account, as required by Paragraphs 4 and
5 of this Order, HMB shall be liable for additional contributions to
the Escrow Account. Such additional contributions shall consist of
the following:
a. Interest at the percentage rate established by the Department
of the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717, for any period after the
due date and
b. A five percent (5%) per month penalty charge if the deposit
is not made within thirty (30) days after the due date.
Provisionally accepted and Provisional Order issued on the 29th
day of August, 2001.
By order of the commission.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-22162 Filed 9-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M