[May 14, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 93)] [Unified Agenda] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [frwais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID: f:ua010449.wais] [Page 26459-26470] Consumer Product Safety Commission [[Page 26459]] Part XLIX _______________________________________________________________________ Semiannual Regulatory Agenda [[Page 26460]] CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (CPSC) _______________________________________________________________________ CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION 16 CFR Ch. II Regulatory Flexibility Act; Semiannual Regulatory Flexibility and Unified Agendas AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda. _______________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission publishes its semiannual regulatory flexibility agenda. In addition, this document includes an agenda of regulatory actions the Commission expects to be under development or review by the agency during the next year. This document meets the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866. DATES: The Commission welcomes comments on each subject area of the agenda, particularly from small entities. Written comments concerning the agenda should be received in the Office of the Secretary by June 30, 2001 ADDRESSES: Comments on the regulatory flexibility agenda should be mailed to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207; telephone (301) 504-0800, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary, Room 502, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. Comments should be captioned ``Regulatory Flexibility Agenda.'' Comments may also be filed by telefacsimile to (301) 504-0127, or by e-mail to cpsc-os@cpsc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on the agenda in general, contact Stephen Lemberg, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207, telephone (301) 504-0980, ext. 2218. For further information regarding a particular item on the agenda, consult the individual listed in the column headed ``Contact'' for that particular item. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612) contains several provisions intended to reduce unnecessary and disproportionate regulatory requirements on small businesses, small governmental organizations, and other small entities. Section 602 of the RFA (5 U.S.C. 602) requires each agency to publish twice each year a regulatory flexibility agenda containing a brief description of the subject area of any rule expected to be proposed or promulgated that is likely to have a ``significant economic impact'' on a ``substantial number'' of small entities. The agency must also provide a summary of the nature of the rule, and a schedule for acting on each rule for which the agency has issued a notice of proposed rulemaking. The regulatory flexibility agenda is also required to contain the name and address of the agency official knowledgeable about the items listed. Further, agencies are required to provide notice of their agendas to small entities and to solicit their comments by direct notification, or by inclusion in publications likely to be obtained by such entities. Additionally, Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to publish twice each year a regulatory agenda of regulations under development or review during the next year, and states that such an agenda may be combined with the agenda published in accordance with the RFA. The regulatory flexibility agenda published below lists the regulatory activities expected to be under development or review during the next 12 months. This agenda also includes regulatory activities that have been completed by the Commission prior to publication. It includes all such activities, whether or not they may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The agenda contains a brief description and summary of each regulatory activity, including the objectives and legal basis for each; an approximate schedule of target dates, subject to revision, for the development or completion of each activity, and the name and telephone number of a knowledgeable agency official concerning particular items on the agenda. All agency contacts have the same address: Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207. Dated: February 22, 2001. Sadye E. Dunn, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission. Consumer Product Safety Commission--Prerule Stage ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regulation Sequence Title Identification Number Number ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4068 Baby Walkers........................................................................ 3041-AB40 4069 Petition HP 99-1 for a Ban of Polyvinyl Chloride in Toys and Other Products Intended 3041-AB79 for Children 5 Years of Age and Under............................................... 4070 Petition FP 99-1 Requesting Labeling Rule for Polyurethane Foam in Upholstered 3041-AB81 Furniture........................................................................... 4071 Petition HP 00-3 Requesting a Ban of Candle Wicks Containing Lead and Candles With 3041-AB87 Such Wicks.......................................................................... 4072 Petition HP 00-2 Requesting a Rule Declaring Natural Rubber Latex a Strong 3041-AB88 Sensitizer.......................................................................... 4073 Petitions FP 00-1, FP 00-2, FP 00-3, and FP 00-4 Requesting Requirements for 3041-AB89 Flammability of Mattresses.......................................................... 4074 Petition CP 00-1 Requesting Performance Requirements for Non-Wood Baseball Bats..... 3041-AB90 4075 Portable Bed Rails.................................................................. 3041-AB91 4076 Petition HP 00-4 Requesting a Rule Banning Baby Bath Seats.......................... 3041-AB93 4077 Petition HP 01-1 Requesting Development of Performance Standard for Bicycle 3041-AB94 Handlebars.......................................................................... 4078 Petition HP 01-02 Requesting Exemption for Model Rocket Propellant Devices Used With 3041-AB95 Ground Vehicles..................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 26461]] Consumer Product Safety Commission--Proposed Rule Stage ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regulation Sequence Title Identification Number Number ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4079 Flammability Standard for Upholstered Furniture..................................... 3041-AB35 4080 Amendment of Safety Regulations for Cribs........................................... 3041-AB67 4081 Requirement for Special Packaging of Oral Prescription Drugs That Are Granted Over- 3041-AB92 The-Counter Status by the Food and Drug Administration.............................. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consumer Product Safety Commission--Final Rule Stage ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regulation Sequence Title Identification Number Number ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4082 Requirements for Child-Resistant Packaging of Household Products Containing 3041-AB57 Petroleum Distillates or Other Hydrocarbons......................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consumer Product Safety Commission--Long-Term Actions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regulation Sequence Title Identification Number Number ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4083 Petition HP 93-1 Requesting Development of a Rule To Ban Certain Backyard Playsets.. 3041-AB47 4084 Amendment of the Standard for the Flammability of Clothing Textiles................. 3041-AB68 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consumer Product Safety Commission--Completed Actions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regulation Sequence Title Identification Number Number ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4085 Dive Sticks......................................................................... 3041-AB82 4086 Petition CP 99-2 Requesting Safety Standard for Bleachers and Grandstands........... 3041-AB84 4087 Amendment of the Safety Standard for Automatic Residential Garage Door Operators.... 3041-AB86 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________________________________ CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (CPSC) Prerule Stage _______________________________________________________________________ 4068. BABY WALKERS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act; 15 USC 1262, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1500 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: On August 2, 1994, the Commission published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) to begin a proceeding that may result in the issuance of mandatory design or performance requirements for baby walkers. A baby walker is a device that supports a child so that the child can use his or her feet to move about before or while learning to walk. Typically, a baby walker consists of a fabric seat that has leg openings and is mounted to a rigid plastic deck. The deck is attached to a base that is mounted on wheels to allow mobility. In 1994, an estimated 25,500 children younger than 15 months of age were treated in hospital emergency rooms for injuries associated with baby walkers. The majority of these injuries resulted from falls down stairs. Among the options under consideration by the Commission are mandatory performance or design requirements to reduce risks of injury associated with baby walkers, particularly those resulting to children from falls down stairs. In response to the Commission's work in this area, the industry published revisions to the voluntary standard for baby walkers in 1997 to address the hazard of falling down stairs. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard contains performance requirements to address risks of injury to children from falls down stairs associated with baby walkers. In 1999, baby walker injuries had dropped to 8,800. The staff is currently assessing the extent of industry conformance with that voluntary standard, designated ``Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Walkers,'' SF 977-97, published by ASTM. The staff will send that information to the Commission together with options for [[Page 26462]] Commission action, including withdrawal of the ANPRM or further regulatory proceedings. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ ANPRM 08/02/94 59 FR 39309 ANPRM Comment Period End 10/03/94 Staff Provided Technical Recommendations to Revise Voluntary Standard 12/16/94 Revised Voluntary Standard Approved 10/01/96 Voluntary Certification Program Began 06/30/97 Staff Completed Monitoring Conformance to Revised Voluntary Standard 05/31/00 Staff Completed Special Study of Injury Data 09/29/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 09/00/01 Commission Decision 10/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Barbara J. Jacobson, Directorate for Health Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0477 Email: bjacobson@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB40 _______________________________________________________________________ 4069. PETITION HP 99-1 FOR A BAN OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE IN TOYS AND OTHER PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR CHILDREN 5 YEARS OF AGE AND UNDER Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 15 USC 1261 to 1278, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1500 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: The National Environmental Trust and 11 other organizations petitioned the Commission to ban polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in toys and other articles intended for the use of children 5 years and under, based upon concerns they have about the potential for health risks from phthalates (especially diisononyl phthalate (DINP)), lead, and cadmium that can be in PVC. A Federal Register notice was issued on December 22, 1998, requesting comment on the petition. Comments were received. The Commission has established a Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel (CHAP) of independent scientists to study issues related to the chronic toxicity and risk, including the risk of cancer, associated with exposure to DINP in children's PVC products. The Commission has begun an extensive exposure study to obtain a broader range of data from which to better define the amount of time children mouth products that could contain phthalates. Following completion of this work, the staff will send a briefing package to the Commission recommending that the Commission grant, deny, or defer the petition. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Notice Advising of Receipt of Petition 12/22/98 63 FR 70756 Initiated Formation of CHAP 02/16/99 Comment Period End 02/22/99 Awarded Contract for Child Observation Study 09/30/99 First Meeting of CHAP 05/10/00 Second Meeting of CHAP 06/20/00 Third Meeting of CHAP 09/12/00 CHAP Sends Report to Commission 05/00/01 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission To Be Determined Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Marilyn L. Wind Ph.D., Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0477 Email: mwind@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB79 _______________________________________________________________________ 4070. PETITION FP 99-1 REQUESTING LABELING RULE FOR POLYURETHANE FOAM IN UPHOLSTERED FURNITURE Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1191, Flammable Fabrics Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: A petition from the National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM) requests that the Commission require labels under the Flammable Fabrics Act warning that polyurethane foam in upholstered furniture poses a fire hazard. NASFM asserts that polyurethane foam in upholstered furniture poses an unreasonable risk of fire because once ignited it burns rapidly and emits toxic gases. NASFM asks the Commission to require that upholstered furniture manufacturers and retailers provide flammability warnings to the public. On April 6, 1999, the Commission published a Federal Register notice to solicit public comments on the petition. The Commission has another ongoing rulemaking proceeding related to the risk of fire associated with upholstered furniture (RIN 3041-AB40) that may bear on the disposition of this petition. In 1994, CPSC published an ANPRM announcing the agency's intent to consider a possible rule or other alternatives to address the risk of upholstered furniture fires ignited by small open-flame sources, e.g., lighters, matches and candles. Such a rule could affect fabrics or other furniture components, including filling materials such as polyurethane foam. The Commission staff is evaluating the technical issues raised in the polyurethane foam petition as part of the larger regulatory development effort. The Commission's consideration of the petition will, therefore, be incorporated into the decision on how to proceed on the small open- flame matter. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Notice 04/06/99 64 FR 16711 Comment Period End 06/07/99 [[Page 26463]] Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 06/00/01 Commission Decision 08/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Dale R. Ray, Project Manager, Directorate for Economic Analysis, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0962 Email: dray@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB81 _______________________________________________________________________ 4071. PETITION HP 00-3 REQUESTING A BAN OF CANDLE WICKS CONTAINING LEAD AND CANDLES WITH SUCH WICKS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: Separate petitions were received from Public Citizen and jointly from the National Apartment Association and the National Multi- Housing Council to ban candle wicks that contain lead and to ban candles with such wicks. The petitioners claimed that burning candles with such wicks produces hazardous combustion products containing lead. On April 2, 2000, the Commission published a notice in the Federal Register to solicit comments on the petition from all interested parties. The comment period closed June 12, 2000. Over 140 comments were received. The staff sent a briefing package to the Commission on December 15, 2001, recommending that the Commission publish an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) to ban metal-corted wicks containing more than 0.06% lead by weight. The staff briefed the Commission on January 30, 2001. On February 13, 2001 the Commission granted the petitions and voted to issue an ANPR. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Petition Docketed 03/17/00 Notice 04/12/00 65 FR 19742 Comment Period End 06/12/00 Commission Voted to Issue ANPR 02/13/01 ANPRM 02/20/01 66 FR 10863 ANPRM Comment Period End 04/23/01 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 07/00/01 Commission Decision 08/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: None Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Kristina Hatlelid, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0994 Email: khatlelid@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB87 _______________________________________________________________________ 4072. PETITION HP 00-2 REQUESTING A RULE DECLARING NATURAL RUBBER LATEX A STRONG SENSITIZER Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: A petition from Debi Adkins, Editor, Latex Allergy News, requests that the Commission issue a rule declaring that natural rubber latex (NRL) and products containing NRL are strong sensitizers under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA) and requiring labeling. NRL is in such consumer products as gloves, adhesives, shoes, balloons, pacifiers, and carpet backing, as well as many medical products. The petitioner states that a portion of the population has developed an allergy to latex that can be debilitating, even causing death. On March 21, 2000, the Commission published a notice in the Federal Register to solicit comments on the petition from all interested persons. On May 24, 2000, at the request of several persons, the Commission published a notice extending the original due date for comments of May 22, 2000 for 30 days to June 21, 2000. Eighty-four comments were received. The staff is preparing a briefing package for consideration by the Commission. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Petition Docketed 03/02/00 Notice 03/21/00 65 FR 15133 Comment Period End 05/22/00 Comment Period Extended 05/24/00 65 FR 33525 Comment Period End 06/21/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 09/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: None Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Suzanne Barone Ph.D., Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0477 Email: sbarone@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB88 _______________________________________________________________________ 4073. PETITIONS FP 00-1, FP 00-2, FP 00-3, AND FP 00-4 REQUESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR FLAMMABILITY OF MATTRESSES Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1191, Flammable Fabrics Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: The Commission has received correspondence from Whitney A. Davis, Director of the Children's Coalition for Fire-Safe Mattresses, requesting that the Commission take various actions concerning mattress flammability. The Commission has docketed as petitions his requests for rules requiring: (1) an open-flame standard similar to the full-scale test set forth in California Technical Bulletin 129; (2) an open flame standard similar to the component test set forth in British Standard 5852; (3) a warning label for flammable mattresses; and (4) a permanent mattress identification tag attached to the inner spring of the [[Page 26464]] mattress. The petitioner focuses primarily on the role polyurethane foam plays in mattress fires. He notes that the Commission's existing mattress flammability standard only addresses cigarette ignition; yet childplay with open-flame sources causes nearly two-thirds of mattress fires. He argues that with polyurethane foam mattresses, fires have become increasingly more deadly than with cotton-batting mattresses due to increased smoke generation, heat production and flame spread. With regard to labels, he notes that polyurethane foam manufacturers provide warnings to mattress manufacturers, but these warnings are not passed on to the consumer. With regard to an identification tag, the petitioner argues that such a tag would help to identify mattresses involved in fires because often only the inner spring unit remains after a mattress fire. The Commission has docketed these petitions under provisions of the Flammable Fabrics Act. The staff will prepare a briefing package for the Commission to consider. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Petitions Docketed 05/22/00 Notice 06/12/00 65 FR 36890 Comment Period End 08/11/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 05/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Margaret L. Neily, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0508 Email: mneily@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB89 _______________________________________________________________________ 4074. PETITION CP 00-1 REQUESTING PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-WOOD BASEBALL BATS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Prodcedure Act; 15 USC 2051, Consumer Product Safety Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: The Commission has received correspondence from J.W. MacKay, Jr. requesting that the Commission issue a rule requiring that all non- wood baseball bats perform like wood bats. He states that such bats have a faster bat swing speed, a larger ``sweet spot,'' and lower balance point than wood bats. These high performance bats, he asserts, allow the ball to achieve a faster exit velocity so that the pitcher does not have time to react if a ball is batted at him. The petitioner asserts that non-wood bats (primarily made of aluminum and composite materials) have become increasingly dangerous. For these reasons, the petitioner argues, such non-wood bats present an unreasonable risk of injury. The Commission docketed his request as a petition under the Consumer Product Safety Act and published a notice in the Federal Register on June 15, 2000 to solicit comments on the petition from interested persons. The staff will prepare a briefing package for the Commission to consider. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Petition Docketed 05/24/00 Notice 06/15/00 65 FR 37525 Comment Period End 08/14/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 05/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Erlinda M. Edwards, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0504 Email: eedwards@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB90 _______________________________________________________________________ 4075. PORTABLE BED RAILS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: The Commission is considering whether certain portable bed rails present an unreasonable risk of injury that should be regulated. A portable bed rail is a device intended to be installed on an adult bed to prevent a child from falling out of the bed. Such bed rails may be constructed in a manner that children can become entrapped between the portable bed rail and the bed. This entrapment can result in serious injury or death. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 06/28/00 Commission Decision 09/21/00 ANPRM 10/03/00 65 FR 58968 ANPRM Comment Period End 12/04/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 08/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Patricia L. Hackett, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0494 Email: phackett@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB91 _______________________________________________________________________ 4076. PETITION HP 00-4 REQUESTING A RULE BANNING BABY BATH SEATS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: A petition from the Consumer Federation of America and other consumer groups, docketed on August 4, 2000, requests that the Commission ban baby bath seats and bath rings. These are consumer products used to hold an infant in a bathtub while the child is being bathed. The petitioners assert that bath seats pose an unreasonable risk of injury, [[Page 26465]] primarily because they create a false sense of security that the child is safe in the bathtub. They assert that 66 incidents of drowning and 37 reports of near drowning involving baby bath seats have been identified. On August 22, 2000, the Commission published a notice in the Federal Register to solicit comments on the petition from all interested persons. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Petition Docketed 08/04/00 Notice 08/22/00 65 FR 50968 Comment Period End 10/23/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 03/30/01 Commission Decision 05/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: None Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Jacqueline Elder, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0554 Email: jelder@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB93 _______________________________________________________________________ 4077. PETITION HP 01-1 REQUESTING DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR BICYCLE HANDLEBARS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: A petition from Flaura Kopkin Winston, MD. Ph.D., Director, The Interdisciplinary Pediatric Injury Control Research Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, requests that the Commission develop a performance standard for bicycle handlebars regarding energy dissipation and distribution during impact. The request was docketed as a petition on January 23, 2001. A notice requesting comment on the petition was published in the Federal Register on February 14, 2001. The initial comment period closed on April 16, 2001. The comment period has been extended to May 16, 2001. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Petition Docketed 01/23/01 Notice 02/14/01 66 FR 10273 Comment Period End 04/16/01 Notice 04/16/01 66 FR 19429 Comment Period End 05/16/01 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission To Be Determined Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: None Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Barbara J. Jacobson, Directorate for Health Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0477 Email: bjacobson@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB94 _______________________________________________________________________ 4078. PETITION HP 01-02 REQUESTING EXEMPTION FOR MODEL ROCKET PROPELLANT DEVICES USED WITH GROUND VEHICLES Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e) Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: A petition from Centuri Corporation requests that the Commission issue a rule exempting certain model rocket propellant devices to be used for model rocket ground vehicles. The petitioner requests that the Commission extend the existing exemption for motors used for flying model rockets to motors used for certain model rocket cars that travel on a tethered line along the ground. The request was docketed as a petition on February 14, 2001. A notice requesting comment on the petition was published in the Federal Register on March 8, 2001. The comment period closes on May 7, 2001. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Petition Docketed 02/14/01 Notice 03/08/01 66 FR 13914 Comment Period End 05/07/01 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 10/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Terrance R. Karels, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Economic Analysis, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0962 Email: tkarels@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB95 _______________________________________________________________________ CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (CPSC) Proposed Rule Stage _______________________________________________________________________ 4079. FLAMMABILITY STANDARD FOR UPHOLSTERED FURNITURE Priority: Economically Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 15 USC 1193, Flammable Fabrics Act CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1640 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: On June 15, 1994, the Commission published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) to begin a proceeding for development of a flammability standard to address risks of death, injury, and property damage from fires associated with ignition of upholstered furniture by small open-flame sources such as matches, lighters, or candles. This ANPRM was issued after the Commission granted part of a petition requesting development of a mandatory [[Page 26466]] flammability standard to address risks of injury from ignition of upholstered furniture by: (1) small open-flame sources; (2) large open- flame sources; and (3) cigarettes. The Commission voted to deny that part of the petition requesting development of a mandatory standard to address hazards associated with ignition of upholstered furniture by large open-flame sources. The Commission also voted to defer a decision on that part of the petition requesting development of a standard to address cigarette ignition, and directed the staff to report to the Commission on the effectiveness of, and the extent of industry compliance with, a voluntary program to reduce risks of ignition of upholstered furniture by cigarettes. The Commission staff developed a draft standard to address ignition of upholstered furniture by small open-flame sources. On March 2, 1998, the Commission voted to defer action on small open- flame sources and gather additional information on the potential toxicity of flame-retardant chemicals that might be used to meet a standard. A public hearing on this subject was held May 5-6, 1998. The staff is analyzing data from the hearing and completing other technical studies. In CPSC's 1999 appropriations legislation, Congress directed the Commission to contract with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) for an independent study of potential health hazards associated with the use of flame retardant chemicals that might be used in upholstered furniture fabrics to meet a CPSC standard. The draft NAS report was completed and forwarded to Congress in April 2000; the final NAS report was published in July 2000. The report concluded that of 16 flame- retardant chemicals reviewed, 8 could be used in upholstered furniture fabrics without presenting health hazards to consumers. Additional exposure studies were recommended for the remaining eight chemicals. The report indicates that a number of suitable flame-retardant treatments are available; these include treatments already in use in various textile products, including upholstered furniture sold in the United Kingdom to meet existing U.K. flammability regulations. CPSC is also considering possible impacts of flame-retardant chemical use on worker safety and the environment. At the CPSC staff's request, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health is assessing potential worker exposure to and risks from certain flame-retardant chemicals that may be used by textile and furniture producers to comply with an upholstered furniture flammability standard. The CPSC staff is also working with the Environmental Protection Agency to consider possible controls on flame-retardant compounds used in residential upholstered furniture fabrics under that agency's Toxic Substances Control Act Authority. Upon completion of its chemical risk assessment and other technical activities, the CPSC staff will present alternatives for future action by the Commission. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ ANPRM 06/15/94 59 FR 30735 ANPRM Comment Period End 08/15/94 Staff Briefing of Commission on NPRM 12/18/97 Commission Voted To Defer Action Pending Results of Toxicity Hearing 03/02/98 Commission Hearing May 5 & 6, 1998 on Possible Toxicity of Flame Retardant Chemicals 03/17/98 63 FR 13017 NAS Study Completed (Required by Congress) 07/10/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 06/00/01 Commission Decision 08/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Dale R. Ray, Project Manager, Directorate for Economic Analysis, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0962 Email: dray@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB35 _______________________________________________________________________ 4080. AMENDMENT OF SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR CRIBS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 5 USC 553, Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1508; 16 CFR 1509 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: On December 16, 1996, the Commission published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) to begin a proceeding that may result in amendment of the safety regulations for full-size and non- full-size cribs, 16 CFR parts 1508 and 1509. Among the regulatory alternatives under consideration is amendment of the regulations to add tests to assure that slats will not disengage from the side panels of cribs. The Commission began this proceeding after considering information about incidents in which crib slats disengaged from the side panels of cribs, creating a risk that children may become entrapped between the remaining slats or fall out of the crib. At the urging of CPSC staff, in April 1999, the voluntary standard for cribs designated, ``Specification for Full Size Baby Cribs (ASTM F1169-99),'' and published by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) was revised to include performance requirements for crib slats. The Commission will consider written comments received in response to the ANPRM, and assess conformance with the voluntary standard before deciding whether to continue the proceeding by publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), or terminate further proceedings in reliance on the voluntary standard. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Staff Recommended Revisions to Voluntary Standard 09/30/96 ANPRM 12/16/96 61 FR 65996 ANPRM Comment Period End 02/14/97 Revisions to Voluntary Standard Approved 04/10/99 Voluntary Certification Program Begins 03/01/00 Staff Begins Monitoring Conformance to Revised Voluntary Standard 04/00/01 Staff Completes Monitoring Conformance To Be Determined Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission To Be Determined [[Page 26467]] Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Patricia Hackett, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0494 Email: phackett@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB67 _______________________________________________________________________ 4081. REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL PACKAGING OF ORAL PRESCRIPTION DRUGS THAT ARE GRANTED OVER-THE-COUNTER STATUS BY THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined Legal Authority: 15 USC 1471, Poison Prevention Packaging Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: On June 23, 2000, the Commission directed the CPSC staff to draft a notice of proposed rulemaking to require that the child- resistant packaging requirements for oral prescription drugs continue when the active chemicals are granted over-the-counter (OTC) status by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The current regulations under the Poison Prevention Packaging Act (PPPA) require child-resistant packaging of most oral prescription drugs. However, when the FDA allows an oral prescription drug to be sold OTC, child-resistant packaging of that drug is no longer required. When the Commission finds that a particular switched OTC drug requires child-resistant packaging because it may cause serious injury or serious illness, it must issue an individual rule, which may not take effect for several years after the switch. On August 30, 2000, the Commission issued a proposed rule that would automatically require drugs that have been switched after the effective date of the rule to be in child-resistant packaging. Under the proposed rule, drugs switched by FDA from prescription to OTC before the effective date of the rule would not automatically have to be in child- resistant packaging. This proposed rule provides that those companies that believe their drug product does not need to be in child-resistant packaging can provide information to the Commission, as they do currently under the PPPA oral prescription drug rule, to demonstrate either: (1) that the drug product will not injure children if it is marketed in non-child-resistant packaging, or (2) that child-resistant packaging is not technically feasible, practicable, or appropriate for the oral drug when marketed as an OTC product. If the Commission agrees, it will by rule exempt the drug product from the PPPA requirements. The Federal Register notice also proposes to revoke 16 CFR 1702.16(b) to allow petitions for exemptions from child-resistant packaging requirements to be submitted and considered by the Commission before the new drug applications (NDA) are approved by the FDA. This would decrease the potential financial and regulatory burdens to the drug company associated with a post-marketing package change. The notice issued by the Commission includes proposed findings that child-resistant packaging for these products is technically feasible, practicable, and appropriate, as well as necessary to protect children from serious personal injury and illness resulting from handling, using, or ingesting the drug products. It is anticipated that this proposed rule would not create a financial burden on small companies. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Staff Briefing of Commission on Whether to Issue an NPRM 06/07/00 Commission Decision to Prepare a Draft NPRM 06/23/00 NPRM 08/30/00 65 FR 52678 NPRM Comment Period End 11/13/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 06/00/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: None Agency Contact: Suzanne Barone Ph.D., Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0477 Email: sbarone@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB92 _______________________________________________________________________ CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (CPSC) Final Rule Stage _______________________________________________________________________ 4082. REQUIREMENTS FOR CHILD-RESISTANT PACKAGING OF HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS CONTAINING PETROLEUM DISTILLATES OR OTHER HYDROCARBONS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 15 USC 1471, Poison Prevention Packaging Act CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1700.14(a) Legal Deadline: None Abstract: Some household products containing 10 percent or more by weight of petroleum distillates are subject to requirements for child- resistant packaging by regulations issued under the Poison Prevention Packaging Act and codified at 16 CFR 1700.14(a). These products include liquid furniture polish (section 1700.14(a)(2)), lighter fluid (section 1700.14(a)(7)), and prepackaged solvents for paint (section 1700.14(a)(15)). However, many other household products containing petroleum distillates or other hydrocarbons are not required to be in child-resistant packaging. On February 26, 1997, the Commission published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) to initiate a proceeding that may result in mandatory requirements for child- resistant packaging of household products containing petroleum distillates or other hydrocarbons. Following consideration of the comments, the Commission [[Page 26468]] proposed requirements for child-resistant packaging of additional household products containing petroleum distillates or other hydrocarbons. The notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was published on January 3, 2000, and the comment period ended March 20, 2000. Seven comments were received. The Commission also requested that additional information about cosmetics that contain mineral oil be obtained. The staff purchased additional information on mineral oil-based cosmetic poisonings from the American Association of Poison Control Centers. The public comment period on the staff analysis of this data closes on May 11, 2001. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ ANPRM 02/26/97 62 FR 8659 Extension of ANPRM Comment Period 04/28/97 62 FR 22897 ANPRM Comment Period End 05/12/97 62 FR 8659 Comment Period End 07/11/97 62 FR 22897 Reopening of ANPRM Comment Period 07/21/97 62 FR 38948 Comment Period End 09/01/97 NPRM 01/03/00 65 FR 93 NPRM Comment Period End 03/20/00 Staff Purchased Additional Poisoning Data on Cosmetics 04/04/00 Notice 04/11/01 66 FR 18738 Comment Period End 05/11/01 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission To Be Determined Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Suzanne Barone Ph.D., Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0477 Email: sbarone@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB57 _______________________________________________________________________ CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (CPSC) Long-Term Actions _______________________________________________________________________ 4083. PETITION HP 93-1 REQUESTING DEVELOPMENT OF A RULE TO BAN CERTAIN BACKYARD PLAYSETS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None Abstract: A petition from the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs requests the Commission to develop a rule to ban certain backyard playsets. The petition asserts that backyard playsets present unreasonable risks of injury to children if they do not meet the requirements of a voluntary standard for home playground equipment published by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); are not accompanied with adequate information about ground surfacing; or lack specific features described in the petition. On May 21, 1996, the Commission denied those parts of the petition requesting issuance of a rule to ban any backyard playset that does not conform to all requirements of the ASTM voluntary standard; that has an accessible height that exceeds six feet above protective surfacing; that does not have adequate fall zones under climbing structures; or that does not provide adequate space between any item of swinging equipment and any other item of swinging or stationary equipment. The Commission deferred a decision on those parts of the petition requesting a rule to ban backyard playsets that are not accompanied with instructions to use and maintain specified ground surfacing; that do not have handrails on all platforms that are 30 inches or higher above protective surfacing; that have swing seats made of wood, metal, plastic, or other hard material capable of inflicting serious injury to the head; that have free- swinging ropes; and that are unanchored playsets with swings. The staff will transmit additional information to the Commission concerning revisions of the voluntary standard, conformance to the voluntary standard, and injury data. The Commission will then decide whether to grant, deny, or continue to defer the remaining requests in the petition. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Partial Denial of Petition 05/21/96 Revisions to Voluntary Standard Completed 07/10/98 Staff Began Monitoring Conformance to Voluntary Standard 08/10/99 Staff Completed Monitoring Conformance 08/31/00 Staff Completed Injury Study 02/28/01 Staff Sends Additional Information to Commission To Be Determined Commission Decision To Be Determined Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Scott Heh, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0494 Email: sheh@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB47 _______________________________________________________________________ 4084. AMENDMENT OF THE STANDARD FOR THE FLAMMABILITY OF CLOTHING TEXTILES Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is undetermined. Legal Authority: 15 USC 1191, Flammable Fabrics Act CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1610 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: The Standard for the Flammability of Clothing Textiles prohibits the manufacture, importation, or sale of clothing, and fabrics and related materials intended for use in clothing, which are dangerously [[Page 26469]] flammable because of rapid and intense burning. The standard prescribes the apparatus, procedure, and criteria to be used for testing to determine compliance with that standard. The standard was made mandatory by the Flammable Fabrics Act of 1953 (Pub. L. 83-88, 67 Stat. 111; June 30, 1953). Some of the equipment and procedures specified by the standard, particularly those for laundering and cleaning of test specimens, have become obsolete, unavailable, or unrepresentative of current practices. The staff is preparing a briefing package describing modifications of the standard that may be needed to assure that the test in the standard is conducted with equipment and procedures representative of conditions to which garments currently are exposed. After consideration of the briefing package, the Commission will decide whether to begin a proceeding for amendment of the standard. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission To Be Determined Commission Decision To Be Determined Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Agency Contact: Margaret L. Neily, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0508 Email: mneily@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB68 _______________________________________________________________________ CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (CPSC) Completed Actions _______________________________________________________________________ 4085. DIVE STICKS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Legal Authority: 15 USC 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1500 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: On July 19, 2000, the Commission published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that may result in a ban of dive sticks with certain characteristics that cause them to be hazardous. Dive sticks are one of several types of devices used for underwater activities, such as retrieval games and swimming instruction. They are typically made of rigid plastic, and are or can be weighted so that when dropped into water they sink and stand upright on the bottom. The proposed rule would ban dive sticks that: (1) are rigid, (2) submerge to the bottom of a pool of water, and (3) stand upright in the water. Many dive sticks have a cylindrically shaped profile, while some have novel shapes like sharks or other sea creatures. Such dive sticks are constructed in such a manner that children can become impaled on them when they jump into shallow water where the dive sticks are oriented in an upright position. This impalement has resulted in serious injuries. Dive sticks that do not have these characteristics, as well as dive rings and dive discs, would be exempt from this rule. The Commission considered written comments received in response to the NPRM and voted on February 26, 2001 to issue a final rule. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ ANPRM 07/16/99 64 FR 38387 ANPRM Comment Period End 09/14/99 NPRM 07/19/00 65 FR 44703 NPRM Comment Period End 10/02/00 Staff Sends Briefing Package to Commission 02/16/01 Commission Decision 02/26/01 Final Rule 03/07/01 66 FR 13646 Final Rule Effective 04/06/01 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: None Agency Contact: Scott Heh, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0494 Email: sheh@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB82 _______________________________________________________________________ 4086. PETITION CP 99-2 REQUESTING SAFETY STANDARD FOR BLEACHERS AND GRANDSTANDS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Legal Authority: 5 USC 553(e), Administrative Procedure Act; 15 USC 2051, Consumer Product Safety Act CFR Citation: None Legal Deadline: None Abstract: A petition from U.S. Representatives Bill Luther and Jim Ramstad requested that the Commission develop a national safety standard for bleachers and grandstands. The petitioners requested that the standard include minimum spacing requirements for gaps between bleacher guardrails and between seats and footboards, side and back safety features, and guidelines for retrofitting older facilities. The request was docketed as a petition on August 10, 1999, and a notice soliciting comments on the petition was published in the Federal Register on August 26, 1999. CPSC staff sent a briefing package to the Commission for consideration on October 16, 2000. On October 26, 2000, the Commission voted to deny the petition and to issue guidelines for retrofitting bleachers. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Petition Docketed 08/10/99 Notice 08/26/99 64 FR 46657 Comment Period End 10/25/99 Staff Sent Briefing Package to Commission 10/16/00 Commission Denied Petition and Voted to Issue Guidelines 10/26/00 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: None Agency Contact: Janet L. Buyer, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences Phone: 301 504-0508 Email: jbuyer@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB84 [[Page 26470]] _______________________________________________________________________ 4087. AMENDMENT OF THE SAFETY STANDARD FOR AUTOMATIC RESIDENTIAL GARAGE DOOR OPERATORS Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Legal Authority: PL 101-608, Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 1990 CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1211 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: The CPSC's safety standard for automatic residential garage door operators protects against entrapment. Death or serious injury can result from entrapment. The entrapment protection requirements come from the UL 325 safety standard for garage door operators. Under the Consumer Product Safety Improvements Act, when UL makes subsequent changes to the entrapment protection provisions of UL 325, UL must notify the Consumer Product Safety Commission of proposed revisions and CPSC must incorporate them into the CPSC rule unless the CPSC notifies UL within 30 days that the CPSC has determined that the revision does not carry out the purposes of the Improvement Act. UL has made changes to its standard to reflect advances in garage door operator technology. The Commission determined that the entrapment related revisions do carry out the purposes of Public Law 101-68. The purpose of this regulatory action is to update the product safety rule to include these new requirements made by UL. On May 15, 2000, the Commission forwarded a draft proposed rule that would amend the garage door operator rule. The proposed rule was published on June 14, 2000. After reviewing comments received on the proposal, the staff provided a briefing package to the Commission on October 31, 2000 for its consideration. On November 11, 2000, the Commission voted to issue a final rule. Timetable: ________________________________________________________________________ Action Date FR Cite ________________________________________________________________________ Staff Sends NPRM Briefing Package to Commission 05/15/00 Commission Decision 05/26/00 NPRM 06/14/00 65 FR 37318 NPRM Comment Period End 08/28/00 Final Rule 11/27/00 65 FR 70656 Final Rule Effective 12/27/00 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: None Agency Contact: John Murphy, Project Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Washington, DC 20207 Phone: 301 504-0494 Email: jmurphy@cpsc.gov RIN: 3041-AB86 [FR Doc. 01-5203 Filed 05-11-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6355-01-S ILLING CODE 6355-01-S